Reality - An Often Overlooked Concept

Having read a recent article by Daniel Gross, the goofy bastard pictured here, I could only sit and wonder on the intricate inner workings of the liberal brain. These people, having warped and twisted logic and reasoning in order to sell their snake oil for so many years, have succumbed to their own brand of bullshit. They have created their own reality, apparently to satisfy their sense of moral superiority and self-righteousness.

Knowing that the author in question, one Daniel Gross, longtime liberal douche bag and current senior editor at Newsweek, helps to understand a bit. Newsweek recently sold its soul, now merely acting simply as a mouthpiece for the liberal left. Anyone of reasonable intelligence and integrity knows there isn't a shred of credibility remaining here, as any of their once loyal subscribers will verify. Since their switch to stroking Obama full time, their circulation has dropped like a stone. Sort of like Obama's ratings as more people are discovering that he is not their Messiah, but merely another crooked, lying, self-absorbed piece of political feces.

By continuously using the term "Republican" rather than "conservative", the author's whining transforms into a statement of politics rather than economics. Those who do not follow the socialistic Utopian fantasies of Obama (and liberal Democrats) can never understand the difference between the GOP and conservative beliefs. Most simply think they are one and the same, but the two have parted ways long ago.

Forget for a moment that Democrats ran the Congress from 2006 to the present. For all of Obama's whining, he helped create the mess he claims to have inherited. Obama voted in the affirmative for practically every nickel spent. And since taking charge, Obama has only made things worse. During the worst economy we've seen in nearly half a century, his sole focus was spending money and wasting an entire year on Obamacare.

Not spending is a concept which the Democrats never have seemed to comprehend. Cutting taxes to business which will allow them to grow, hire more people, and actually increase tax revenues seems to confuse them even more. These pompous jackasses seem to think that their sole purpose on the planet is to spend as much as they can get their hands on, regardless where it comes from or if it actually helps anyone.

See the writing on the wall, Mr. Gross. The Democrats have wasted their chance to run Congress through their own bickering and back-stabbing ways. The election of Scott Brown should raise a big red flag. The public has had just about all it can take of Democratic majority. This is a center-right country, and all your progressive ideology is so much fertilizer.

Stimulus - Bigger is Better

Those doubting the brilliance of Obama's plan need only familiarize themselves with the basic principals of liberal economics: Money falls from heaven for everyone to use. But, the immoral and sneaky rich gather more than their share. The government's purpose is to redistribute the money the way God intended.

Taxes remove the excess income of the rich and give it to the voting poor, through a fair and organized bureaucracy. The rich oppose this action by selfishly and spitefully decreasing employment. Government responds by increasing spending, to boost employment by finding the jobs that the rich have been hiding.

Looking at the rousing success of the first Stimulus bill, I cannot understand the opposition to round two. Obama's work is not yet done, as there are still those who have yet to realize the New American dream of getting something for nothing.

For an idea of the massive number of jobs created by the Stimulus bill, simply look at the unemployment offices around the country. These establishments have been forced to double their staffs in order to process the millions of new claims filed over the last year.

To understand the need for a second (or third, or tenth) stimulus bill, we must keep in mind the economies of scale. If spending $787B accomplished so much, imagine the economic magic that a much larger amount could accomplish.

Borrowing an amount large enough could eliminate the national debt altogether. Theoretically we should be able to to borrow enough to show a profit, perhaps begin lending to other countries again. All we have to do is borrow enough each time to pay off each successive debtor, with interest, and we can keep the cycle going indefinitely.

Granted, job recovery may seem like its staring slowly. Some folks have been unemployed for 12 months, some longer. This is probably because we haven't spent enough to create the jobs. But once we really kick the spending into high gear, we will all need wheelbarrows to carry our money home in. And not just because it will be practically worthless, either.

Bob Herbert, Liberal Racist Scumbag

I laugh at Bob Herbert and all like him, angry liberals with a huge black chip on their shoulder. "Boo-hoo, I'm black, God hates me, I got a dealt a bad hand in life." News flash: Nobody gives a crap, Bob. Everything in life is not about race.

Most people would love to move forward, yet small minded people like you always want to perpetuate the racial divide. The painful truth is you don't want to be judged by who you are. You mistakenly feel your position as a "minority" gives you special privilege that you would otherwise not enjoy when truly treated as equals.

You are correct, Bob, that the election was not a sign of some "post-racial nirvana." The election of Barrack Obama was simply a shrewd political move by the far left to place a black man in office so that anyone who disagrees with him is branded as racist. Yes, the "race card" is still a powerful tool, used effectively by activists and lunatics alike.

His candidacy was designed to play against "white guilt", or the bizarre concept that everyone in the US is somehow responsible for slavery and the oppression of the black race.

With the nomination of Ms. Sotomayor, we now have to listen to the same stupid argument. She will obviously receive no opposition from the Democrats, who relish the idea of an empathetic justice. But any Republican who questions her character will be construed as racist by hate-mongers such as yourself.

Please, Bob, let us know when you have something positive to say. Until then, spread your poison somewhere else.

(Bob Herbert is a "journalist" who contributes hateful articles to the New York Times. Go figure.)